Miscellaneous / News

Pro-Choice Activists Thank Dr. Henry Morgentaler

By Shannon Clarke

Images courtesy of rabbleradio via Wikimedia Commons

Somewhere in east Montreal is the clinic that became the catalyst for abortion reform in Canada more than 25 years ago. If you were to walk by it now, however, it’s just a normal house on a quiet residential street.

At Innis Town Hall last week on Jan. 28, feminists, allies and pro-choice activists celebrated the 25th anniversary of the Morgentaler Decision, when abortion became legal in Canada. Some participants had never known a time when abortion wasn’t legal.

“It’s incredible that in my entire lifetime, women have had the opportunity to live up to their potential and aspirations,” said Jillian Bardsley, a second year med student and co-president of the Toronto chapter for Medical Students for Choice.

Dr. Henry Morgentaler, wasn’t there, but his wife, Arlene Leibowitz, did attend the celebration.

The evening was organized by Medical Students for Choice at the University of Toronto, and co-hosted by the Ontario Coalition for Abortion Clinics. It included a panel of women who were at the centre of the pro-choice movement inspired by Dr. Morgentaler’s then-illegal practice. He was the only trained physician in Canada who would do the procedure in 1969, when he performed his first abortion in Montreal at his newly-opened private abortion clinic.

“It was the most extraordinary political experience I ever had,” said writer Judy Rebick, who worked closely with Dr. Morgentaler in Toronto, and soon became known as “the Girl From the Clinic”.

On Jan. 28, 1988, the Supreme Court of Canada struck down a law that made abortions available but rarely possible. Women (mainly women privileged enough that they could afford the trip to Buffalo or pay for a private gynecologist) had to wait for a committee of men – the Therapeutic Abortion Committee – to decide whether or not they could obtain one.

It didn’t stop women from getting back-alley abortions in deplorable and often fatal conditions.

“We were just women and some men who felt we had to fight on principle,” said activist Carolyn Egan.  “We fought for women to choose the children they had.”

Journalist Michele Landsberg became a link to the movement after her column at the Toronto Star. It was in that column that she wrote about anti-choice activist Joe Borowski, who spoke to a court in Saskatchewan on behalf of all unborn ovum in 1983. No women were invited to speak at the trial.

Landsberg read from her book Writing the Revolution on Monday night, and explained the satirical tone that her article took back then.

“I was struggling to make people understand how ludicrous it was to let men make decisions about of our bodies,” she said.

So pro-choice women made their voices heard in other ways. They organized at Queen’s Park and marched through Toronto’s downtown streets to Morgentaler’s second clinic in Toronto. They supported him when he was arrested, tried, convicted (the first time in Canadian history an appeal court overruled a verdict of not guilty) and jailed for 10 months. They rallied around him again when he won his third appeal in 1976, stirring up supporters wherever they went.

“People who didn’t have a strong position on choice saw him as a hero,” Rebick said. “They saw him as a little guy against the system.”

Morgentaler, an immigrant from Poland and Holocaust survivor, fought blatant anti-Semitism and threats in Montreal and Toronto in the years leading up to the landmark ruling. While he made history and changed the law by breaking it, his example only energized his detractors, who were also willing to go to jail for their cause.

He also faced considerable resistance from within the movement.  Some women, said Egan, were opposed to rallying around a man for the right to choose.

Even after the ruling in 1988, Morgentaler’s life and the lives of all abortion providers were at risk.

The 90’s saw the high profile murders of three doctors in Vancouver, Manitoba and Ancaster, Ont. In 1992 a firebomb tore through the Toronto Women’s Bookstore in an attempt to destroy Morgentaler’s clinic on Harbord Street.

For all of the celebration this year, there is still work to be done, at home and around the world.

As of this year there are no abortions providers on Prince Edward Island (and women must get two letters of referrals from doctors before going elsewhere), and only a single clinic in Fredericton and women have to pay out of pocket. Conservative MPP Tim Hudak supported anti-choice legislation, and when the G8 summits were being held in Toronto in 2010, the Harper government did not include abortion in its discussion on maternal health-care in developing nations.

It’s what Robertson, the director of equity and community engagement at Women’s College Hospital, calls “anti-choice by stealth”.

“If [abortion rights] are worth protecting for women in this country, are they not equally worth protecting for other women around the world?” she says.

Abortion is only discussed in half of all Canadian medical schools and, said Bardsley, sometimes focus mainly on the philosophy and ethics surrounding the practice. In many schools there are few answers about questions about the procedure itself – duration, pain, recovery, process – despite the fact that a quarter of all pregnancies in Canada will end in abortion and third of women in North America will have one.

Since 1969 Dr. Morgentaler has opened eight clinics across Canada and has performed over 75, 000 abortions. He continues to practice and received the Order of Canada in 2008.

Dr. Morgentaler remains a polarizing figure in this country – a hero to some, and a murderer to others – but his work has made him one of the most important Canadians in history. Not a small feat for the man who vowed to follow in his social activist father’s footsteps.

“It was the movement that made the change but it was Henry Morgentaler who sparked the movement,” said Egan. M

Advertisements

17 thoughts on “Pro-Choice Activists Thank Dr. Henry Morgentaler

  1. I am one of the authors of “Our Bodies, Ourselves” and left the U.S. in 1974 to live in Canada. Dr. Morgentaler has had my unqualified admiration, support and respect ever since he first began fighting for women’s freedom of choice. Your principled and courageous stand touches me more deeply than I can ever fully express. Thank you, Dr. Morgentaler, for a life well lived!

  2. A fascinating discussion is definitely worth comment.
    There’s no doubt that that you should write more about this subject matter, it might not be a taboo matter but generally folks don’t talk about such topics.
    To the next! All the best!!

  3. From a more practical standpoint, beyond risqué romps with your beloved and Halloween
    attire, you could also wear these shoes, we still think they are something to be admired.

    The Famous Louboutin Red SoleDesigner michael kors outlet online,
    has created a beautiful, high end line of shoes with high heels.

  4. applications have so far only able to be run on PS Vita’s predecessor, all
    Sony PSP. In this buyer’s guide we take a look at a wide
    range of Sony Ericsson phones and bring you the details you need to make a decision.
    This makes them more exciting and more fun to play than on other
    hand-held platforms.

  5. Hey there, I think your blog might be having browser
    compatibility issues. When I look at your blog site in Safari, it looks fine but when opening in Internet Explorer,
    it has some overlapping. I just wanted to give
    you a quick heads up! Other then that, very good blog!

  6. Attractive section of content. I just stumbled upon your website and in accession capital to assert tat I get
    actually enjoyed account your blog posts. Anyway I’ll be subscribing to your augment and even I
    achievement you access consistently quickly.

  7. October 15 2012 at 1:38 pm“I would equate the cells on my nose to be “potential” huanms in the same way that I would consider a sperm cell or unfertilized egg to be a “potential” human. Without some form of intervention neither will become a human. A fertilized egg IS in fact a human being at it’s earliest stage of development. I’m not sure how I can be more clear than that.”This IS clearer. Thank you for at least this much clarification.burgels says: October 15 2012 at 1:38 pm“Your argument, as I understand it, is that that person, because it is too similar to a clump of cells from someone’s nose has no right to life. To me that is no less nonsensical.”That assertion IS nonsensical. It is not my assertion at all. My assertion is that both a fertilized egg and a clump of cells are too DISsimilar from a person for EITHER to be considered a person. They are extremely similar to one another in that they both fail to really be what I would call a person.burgels says: October 15 2012 at 1:38 pm“To put the question back to you; at what point do you believe that the clump of cells becomes human and has human rights? How do you quantify when it has achieved this?”This is a fair and important question, which you and Jeremy have already gone deeper into. After reading both of you (and thinking a great deal about it) I have come to at least some form of answer, which I will give by the end of this post.burgels says: October 15 2012 at 1:38 pm“And further what gives you the right to decide that it has finally “earned” it’s inalienable rights?”Now this was a question that – had it been posted by some random person on the internet I would have dismissed it as empty rhetoric. But I know you for the intelligent and thoughtful person you are, so I’ll answer. I have more than the right to make these distinctions. I (WE, in fact) have the OBLIGATION to weigh these matters and seek reasonable and moral answers. What gives me/us this obligation? You said yourself in this blog’s commentaries, “I consider my vote an endorsement, and I can’t in good conscious vote for someone who is accepting of something that I find utterly detestable” (Oct. 5th) Our votes count for quite a lot, and we must understand what we find despicable and why. If we find ourselves mistaken (this goes for both of us) then we have the moral obligation to be clear on that, and to consider voting in a way that reflects that change. Surely you’d sooner embrace the right to make these judgments than turn away from the life of the thinking and caring human being you are! These sorts of judgments are a part of what makes us human adults, and participants in the world. (Though you will later see that I do not include such judgment abilities to the definition of who gets the right to life.)burgels says: October 16, 2012 at 12:04 pm There is no such thing as “potentially human”.’Just a little nitpick: you did give examples of “potential human” on October 15th, but your point here is clear, nonetheless.burgels says: October 16, 2012 at 12:04 pm“Also your continued use of the phrase “human in form” allows for the possibility that anything that looks human is human, which clearly isn’t the case. i.e. Crash test dummies etc. Sorry if that’s overly picky.”It is a little bit picky, but I will agree with you, Shane, that arms and legs would not fall under my requirements for the right to life. I know a college student who was born without arms, and his legs are non-functional. Definitely still a human being. I will clarify later in this post.Next will be some things from Jeremy

  8. I do consider all the concepts you have presented for
    your post. They are vrry convincing and can certainly work.

    Nonetheless, the posts are too short for novices. Could you please extend them a bit
    from subsequent time? Thanks for the post.

  9. Hmm is anyone else encountering problems with the pictures on this blog
    loading? I’m trying to determine if its a problem on my
    end or if it’s the blog. Any feed-back would be geatly appreciated.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s